Hi, Terry -

Thank you for your message. As I see it, unity (in diversity), as expressed in consultation, in social evolution, etc., is the spiritual technology, or methodology, to reach truth. That is why, I think, we are told to obey our assemblies even should we have reason to believe that what they say may not, at least from one’s own particular perspective, be the truth. Of course, individuals are free to privately appeal a decision to a higher institution so long as they do not stir up dissension (disunty) in doing so.

As I see it, God blesses actions performed in the spirit of unity. If we unite with an administrative decision, obeying it out of loyalty to the Centre of the Covenant (Who watches over assemblies), we can, I believe, trust that, through our own unity with the assembly, the truth of the situation will eventually be found, and any injustices will be righted.

Private assessments of truth may or may not be valid and, as we know, we often change our views of what is true as we continue to deepen in the Teachings. If each one of us maintained her or his right to engage in public behavior according to one’s own determination of the truth, in spite of administrative guidance, what the House referred to as “administrative unity” would be sacrificed for the sake of contemporary secular notions of “individual rights and freedoms.”

One of my difficulties with the views put forth by some persons on this list is that they seem to approximate Weber’s Western liberal critique of Marxian radicalism. Personally, my sympathies lie more on the side of spiritual radicalism (such as with Pitirim Sorokin). Weber had a love-hate relationship with bureaucracy, but he recognized its many faults and was obviously fearful of the direction to which it might eventually take the West. However, to me, the *real* and *enduring* solution to the problems we face in the West cannot be found primarily in bureaucratic reform, or in improving formal organizational efficiency (though it couldn’t hurt), but in radically changing the narrative structure from one based on the symbol systems of the old order to one based on the discursive framework of the Baha’i Teachings.

At the heart of this new framework, IMO, is the Baha’i metaphysic of unity in diversity. Consultation requires not only that one be frank and open but that one look for truth as it emerges through the process of, in this case, consulting, in what I would regard as acceptable settings (such as in private correspondance or in district conventions), with the appropriate administrative institutions. That is my view, and, in the spirit of consultation, I certainly have no wish to enforce it on others.

I agree with you, in general, about the World Order of Baha’u'llah being an “irfan republic,” as you call it. Certainly, as you say, the Baha’i system is not just administration. The polity is the form; but without the spirit of faith, it will be of no use. However, as I think I have mentioned to you before, I would suggest that it might be useful to add a third “house” to the conception, making it a trinity of Houses of Worship, Houses of Justice, *and* Houses of Finance (a.k.a. the local storehouse to be administered by the “trusted ones” of each local community). IMV, the economy of a community is on par with the other two in importance (i.e., the life-blood of a community) and, in common practice, it, too, plays a central role in the Nineteen-Day Feast.

Happy World Interfaith Harmony Week! Having trouble reading this email? View it in your browser. The 2012 WIHW is Here! Let’s Make It an Unforgettable Week. It’s back! The 2012 World Interfaith Harmony Week is back and picking up a ton of steam with nearly a dozen events being added daily over the past week. We are on pace to have even more events then last year, continuing the great progress that was made last year. In This Newsletter The WIHW is Here! What’s Next? What’s Next? We’ll send out summary email about the 2012 WIHW as well as a questionnaire to get feedback on your experience with the WIHW and how we can make it a greater success next year. We’ll post images from all over the world and send a wrap up email, so please do send us images or links to some images of your event. After that the email campaigns will slow down over the next several months with just a few emails notifying you of vital information. Forward this email Do you know someone who might be interested in receiving this newsletter? Forward this email to them and help us spread the word! Unsubscribe You’re receiving this newsletter from the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Center because you signed up to our parent organization’s email list, which includes our other projects such as A Common Word, The Amman Message, Islam & Buddhism, Al-Tafsir.com and many others. Unsubscribe Contact us 20 Sa’ed Bino Road, Dabuq PO BOX 950361 Amman 11195, JORDAN 00 962 6 5341168 www.rissc.jo outreach@rissc.jo

]]> /cgi/wp/?feed=rss2&p=33 /cgi/wp/?p=32 /cgi/wp/?p=32#comments Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:51:44 +0000 owner Uncategorized /cgi/wp/?p=32 For what it’s worth, as a former journalism major (undergraduate degree), my first letter to the Universal House of Justice (mid 1970s) asked it about journalism and freedom of the press. (I misplaced both the original letter and the response - pre-email days.)

In my opinion, it is simply too early to know the precise role for a free press in a Baha’i system. However, my guess is that it will involve a high degree of mutual trust and respect.

The Universal House of Justice determines its own areas of authority. Our own duty is obedience.

The Campers (as I call them), followers of Family Radio’s Harold Camping, believe that they will be (or, depending on your time of reading, believed that they were supposed to be) raptured (miraculously translated or transported to Heaven) on May 21, 2011. The next five months would witness tremendous worldwide suffering. Then, on October 21, 2011, the entire universe would be destroyed. A new heaven and a new earth would be created in its place.

Although I find the proposition of a rapture, as understood by Camping and by many other Christians who reject Camping’s date setting, to be erroneous, the concurrence between Camping’s rapture and my own view of the Great Unraveling is, in my view, fascinating. The dates set by the Millerites were, for whatever reason, reasonably close to the Declaration of the Báb (May 23, 1844). Perhaps “the Campers” are, like the Millerites, approximately correct regarding the time frame but inexact concerning the specific events.

Reference Materials

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/the_end_of_the_world.pdf

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/judgement_day_feared_by_the_world.pdf 

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/no_man_knows.pdf 

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/5-21-2011.pdf 

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/we_are_almost_there.pdf 

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/ebiblefellowship.pdf 

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/we_can_know.pdf 

Death is joyful, if one is prepared, but pain and suffering are tragic. Sadly, many people are not prepared. They are waiting on a rapture (to be transported to heaven before the great unraveling), a messiah, or for 2012. As I told two friends of mine last year, I have had, since then, strong feelings about universal catastrophes beginning in February or March of 2011. I hope I am wrong.

Similarly, social networking has replaced the substance of human relationships, whether electronically or face to face, into a superficial texting. The substance is gone. As Marshall McLuhan apt observed, the medium is the message.

Jesus came to Jews, in the sense that he fulfilled their prophecies. However, I see no evidence that he came just to Jews. So-called gentiles were incorporated into Israel. There was no distinction between Jew and Greek.

The Sabbath, for instance, is not an “essence.” It is a name for the seventh day. Therefore, the sabbath might be different days for different people. Whatever is the seventh day, at the end of one’s work week, is, by definition, the sabbath.

Sadly, not pointed out in the piece are two significant points:

1. The manner in which many people on the rabid right wing flame the fires of hatred. Remember, for instance, Ann Coulter saying:
   

   We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.

2. The similarities between The Narrative and certain versions of the Illuminati Conspiracy, which contend that there is a global conspiracy to establish a one-world government, and to lock up all Christians (in prisons which have supposedly been already built for that purpose) or to take away their freedoms.

Many of the people who accept both the Illuminati Conspiracy and its Islāmic variant are not uneducated people. They have not, however, been adequately trained how to think properly.

1. Sikhism, e.g., http://aboutsikhism.org/

2. Kabir Panth, e.g., http://www.sahibbandgi.org/

3. Surat Shabd Yoga, e.g., http://www.santmat.net/

4. Dadu Panth, e.g., http://www.santdadu.org/aboutus.htm

Sant Mat developed in the context of the diverse Hindu and Muslim population of the Indian subcontinent. It beliefs reflect both Hindu and Muslim (particularly Sufi) influences.

Concerning the place of Sant Mat in the context of the Bahá’í Faith: Although I am not aware of any statements which establish the stations of Guru Nanak, Kabir, or any of the other personages connected with Sant Mat, I would suggest that it can perhaps be seen as a uniquely Indian religious reform movement.